On 2021-05-16, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 09:51:17AM +0100, Jernej Škrabec wrote: >> Let me first explain that it was oversight on my side not noticing initials in >> your SoB tag. But since the issue was raised by Maxime, I didn't follow up. >> >> Dne sobota, 13. februar 2021 ob 07:51:32 CET je B.R. Oake napisal(a): >> > On Wed Feb 10 at 16:01:18 CET 2021, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > > Unfortunately we can't take this patch as is, this needs to be your real >> > > name, see: >> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#de >> > > veloper-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1 >> > Dear Maxime, >> > >> > Thank you very much for considering my contribution and for all your >> > work on supporting sunxi-based hardware; I appreciate it. >> > >> > Thank you for referring me to the Developer's Certificate of Origin, but >> > I had already read it before submitting (I had to do so in order to know >> > what I was saying by "Signed-off-by:") and I do certify what it says. >> > >> > Looking through recent entries in the commit log of the mainline kernel, >> > I see several patches from authors such as: >> > >> > H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx> >> > B K Karthik <karthik.bk2000@xxxxxxxx> >> > JC Kuo <jckuo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > EJ Hsu <ejh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > LH Lin <lh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Shreyas NC <shreyas.nc@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Vandana BN <bnvandana@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > so I believe names of this form are in fact acceptable, even if the >> > style might seem a little old-fashioned to some. >> >> Speaking generally, not only for this case, prior art arguments rarely hold, >> because: >> - it might be oversight, >> - it might be a bad practice, which should not be followed in new >> contributions, >> - different maintainers have different point of view on same thing, >> - maintainer wants to adapt new practice or steer subsystem in new direction >> >> > >> > I would like to add that I have met many people with names such as C.J., >> > A A, TC, MG, etc. That is what everybody calls them and it would be >> > natural for them to sign themselves that way. Some of them might want to >> > contribute to Linux some day, and I think it would be a great shame and >> > a loss to all of us if they were discouraged from doing so by reading >> > our conversation in the archives and concluding that any contribution >> > from them, however small, would be summarily refused simply because of >> > their name. Please could you ensure that does not happen? >> >> The link you posted says following: >> "using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)" >> >> I believe that real name means no initials, no matter what people are >> accustomed to. From my point of view, CJ is pseudonym derived from real name. >> >> This is not the first time that fix of SoB tag was requested, you can find such >> requests in ML archives. I'm sure this isn't the first time this sort of thing has been brought up on this subject, but I feel obliged to mention: https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ This seems to be blocked on culturally dependent perception of what looks like a "real name" as opposed to any technical grounds. What is the goal of the "real name" in Signed-off-by actually trying to achieve? live well, vagrant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
