On Wednesday 16 July 2014 10:40:19 Sudeep Holla wrote: > > + > > +Required property: > > +- mbox: List of phandle and mailbox channel specifier. > > + > > +- mbox-names: List of identifier strings for each mailbox channel > > + required by the client. > > + > > IMO the mailbox names are more associated with the controller channels/ > mailbox rather than the clients using it. Does it make sense to move > this under controller. It also avoid each client replicating the names. I think it would be best to just make the mbox-names property optional, like we have for other subsystems. Doing it in the mbox-controller makes no sense at all, because the mbox controller has (or should have) no idea what the attached devices are. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
