On 14 July 2014 19:38, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 July 2014 14:30:52 Mollie Wu wrote:
>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/clock/fujitsu,mb86s7x_clk.txt | 32 ++
>> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c | 352 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 385 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fujitsu,mb86s7x_clk.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fujitsu,mb86s7x_clk.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fujitsu,mb86s7x_clk.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..4a17d79
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fujitsu,mb86s7x_clk.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +Fujitsu CRG11 clock driver bindings
>> +-----------------------------------
>> +
>> +Required properties :
>> +- compatible : Shall contain "fujitsu,mb86s7x_clk"
>
> No wildcards in compatible strings please.
>
OK
>> +- #clock-cells : Shall be 0
>> +- cntrlr : 0->ALW, 1->DDR3, 2->MAIN, 3->CA15, 4->HDMI, 5->DPHY
>> +- domain : [0, 15]
>> +- port : [0,7] -> Gateable Clock Ports. [8]->UngatedCLK
>
> It would be good to be a bit more verbose here.
>
That is how the clock controller is on this soc. The UngatedCLK is the
source of 8 gateable clock ports as well as having its own output
port. The PLLs and divisors are internally programmed by the remote
master.
>> +
>> +struct clk *mb86s7x_clclk_register(struct device *cpu_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct clk_init_data init;
>> + struct cl_clk *clc;
>> +
>> + clc = kzalloc(sizeof(*clc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!clc) {
>> + pr_err("could not allocate cl_clk\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + }
>> +
>> + clc->hw.init = &init;
>> + clc->cluster = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
>> +
>> + init.name = dev_name(cpu_dev);
>> + init.ops = &clk_clc_ops;
>> + init.flags = CLK_IS_ROOT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;
>> + init.num_parents = 0;
>> +
>> + return devm_clk_register(cpu_dev, &clc->hw);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mb86s7x_clclk_of_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> +
>> + if (!cpu_dev) {
>> + pr_err("failed to get cpu%d device\n", cpu);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + clk = mb86s7x_clclk_register(cpu_dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> + pr_err("failed to register cpu%d clock\n", cpu);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + if (clk_register_clkdev(clk, NULL, dev_name(cpu_dev))) {
>> + pr_err("failed to register cpu%d clock lookup\n", cpu);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + pr_debug("registered clk for %s\n", dev_name(cpu_dev));
>> + }
>> +
>> + platform_device_register_simple("arm-bL-cpufreq-dt", -1, NULL, 0);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +module_init(mb86s7x_clclk_of_init);
>>
>
> This looks weird: why don't you probe the clocks from DT like normal?
>
We need to register clocks for each cpu populated, which is only after
all clock providers are probed by CLK_OF_DECLARE()
> Why do you register a platform device here? Are you trying to hide the fact that
> the cpufreq stuff still doesn't use proper DT probing?
>
Yup, the generic bL cpufreq driver doesn't probe by DT.
thanks
-jassi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
