On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:56 PM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: but not active > > know if there is a good reason not to go with active/inactive. > > Linus: So we're already 3 out of 3 who would like active/inactive better > than asserted/deasserted. I'm curious about your preference, too. I suppose it depends on where you come from. In electronics the terms asserted/deasserted is commonly used and that is where I'm coming from. Maybe just the materials I've been subjected to, who knows. Yours, Linus Walleij
