Hi Wolfram, On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > + st,smbus-alert: > > After reading the specs again, I think we can make this a generic > binding. SMBusAlert is optional. So, we can say it is not covered by the > "smbus" binding and needs a seperate one. Makes sense? Indeed, SMBus Spec [1] mentions about SMBALERT#: An optional signal that a slave device can use to notify the system master that it has information for the master Hence it does make sense to separate it from the smbus binding. I will post a v4 of this serie with the addition of a generic binding 'smbus-alert'. Alain [1] http://www.smbus.org/specs/SMBus_3_1_20180319.pdf
