Hi Mark, On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:51:38AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:20:17AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > > linux,keycode feels a bit overkill here though, so I'd rather go for a > > fixed-size linux,keycodes property. The number of entries is fixed, > > anyway. Would you be fine with that? > > Assuming no-one's likely to want a sparse keymap (i.e. one where some > keys do nothing) then that's probably ok. For such a small keymap, if one does not want to use some of the buttons, setting corresponding entries to KEY_RESERVED should work well. > > > > I took that from the gpio-keys driver. Is there a better way to denote > > such a feature? > > Unfortunately not, given current practice. My gripe is that it's a Linux > detail that were describing rather than a property of the device. We can > forget about that for now. I prefer looking at it as user expressing the desired behavior of the driver; it is up to OS to deliver such behavior ;) Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
