On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:31:34 +0100, Anirudha Sarangi <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch ensures that xilinx_intc_of_init API is not allocated into > the .init.text section. Since this API calls the API set_handle_irq > which uses __init macro to be put into .init.text section, this patch > makes changes to ensure that set_handle_irq also does not stay in > .init.text section. > This patch is in preparation for the patch through which the xilinx > intc driver will be loaded and unloaded as a module. > > Signed-off-by: Anirudha Sarangi <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c | 4 ++-- > include/linux/irq.h | 2 +- > kernel/irq/handle.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c > index 1d3d273309bd..642733a6cbdf 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c > @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static void xil_intc_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) > chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); > } > > -static int __init xilinx_intc_of_init(struct device_node *intc, > - struct device_node *parent) > +static int xilinx_intc_of_init(struct device_node *intc, > + struct device_node *parent) > { > struct xintc_irq_chip *irqc; > int ret, irq; > diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h > index 2efde6a79b7e..252fab8074de 100644 > --- a/include/linux/irq.h > +++ b/include/linux/irq.h > @@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ int ipi_send_mask(unsigned int virq, const struct cpumask *dest); > * Returns 0 on success, or -EBUSY if an IRQ handler has already been > * registered. > */ > -int __init set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *)); > +int set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *)); > > /* > * Allows interrupt handlers to find the irqchip that's been registered as the > diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c > index 762a928e18f9..a0b18e8f5af0 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ irqreturn_t handle_irq_event(struct irq_desc *desc) > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER > -int __init set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *)) > +int set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *)) > { > if (handle_arch_irq) > return -EBUSY; No, never. This function is for a root interrupt controller. You will never be able to use this from a module. If you are calling this from something that isn't marked __init, this is a terrible bug. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.