> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
> i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:28:00PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
> > > i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP
> > >
> > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 19:01, Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mathieu,
> > > >
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
> > > > > i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:20:14AM +0800, peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > V5:
> > > > > > Add R-b tag
> > > > > > Move the change in detect mode of patch 5 to patch 7 Per
> > > > > > Mathieu's comments
> > > > > >
> > > > > > V4:
> > > > > > Typo fix
> > > > > > patch 4: take state as a check condition patch 5: move
> > > > > > regmap lookup/attach to imx_rproc_detect_mode patch 6: add
> > > > > > imx_rproc_clk_enable for optional clk patch 8: use
> > > > > > switch/case in imx_rproc_detect_mode
> > > > > > V3:
> > > > > > Add A-b tag for Patch 1/2
> > > > > > Fix the checkpatch warning for Patch 6,8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > V2:
> > > > > > Patch 1/8, use fsl as vendor, typo fix Because patchset [1]
> > > > > > has
> > > > > > v2 version, patch 5,6,7,8 are adapted that change.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patchset is to support i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP, also includes a
> > > > > > patch to parse fsl,auto-boot
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > One of the request I had from the last revision was to
> > > > > explicitly list what other patchset this work depends on and
> > > > > what branch it is based of, something I can't find here.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, that patchset has been merged, so I remove that line.
> > > > I should mention that that patchset has been merged into Linux-next
> tree.
> > > >
> > >
> > > And what branch this set should be applied to is missing.
> >
> > I take latest linux-next/master for my upstream new feature work.
> >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As such I am dropping this set and won't look at another
> > > > > revision before May 22nd.
> > > >
> > > > Ah. Is it just because that the dependency patchset not been
> > > > mentioned or you have issue applying the patchset that delay the
> > > > patchset for one
> > > month?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Both.
> >
> > I replay my flow:
> > git fetch linux-next
> > git checkout linux-next/master -b master-next-4-24-2021 pwclient list
> > -w "Peng Fan (OSS)" -s New | grep V5 | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -I {}
> > pwclient git-am {}
> >
> > It could successfully apply the patchset.
> > Applying patch #12215291 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,1/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add
> > fsl,auto-boot property
> > Applying: dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add fsl,auto-boot
> > property Applying patch #12215293 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,2/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX7ULP
> > support
> > Applying: dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX7ULP support
> > Applying patch #12215295 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,3/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
> > i.MX8MN/P
> > Applying: dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> > Applying patch #12215297 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,4/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: parse fsl,auto-boot
> > Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: parse fsl,auto-boot Applying patch
> > #12215299 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,5/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: initial support for
> > mutilple start/stop method
> > Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: initial support for mutilple
> > start/stop method Applying patch #12215301 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,6/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional
> > Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional Applying patch
> > #12215303 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,7/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX7ULP
> > Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX7ULP Applying patch
> > #12215305 using 'git am'
> > Description: [V5,8/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> > Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> >
> >
> > If anything wrong my work flow conflicts with Linux remoteproc
> > subsystem upstream flow, please correct me, and I'll follow.
> >
> > Thanks for your time and patience on reviewing my patches. Sorry for
> > the inconvince that I bring in.
> >
> > Anyway please share me your flow to apply patches, I will try to avoid
> > unhappy things in following patches.
> >
>
> All I asked is that you list the branch your work is based on _and_ any
> dependencies, something you did not do.
ok, got it.
>
> I review hundreds of patchsets every year and knowing exactly how to work
> with a series goes a long way in saving precious time, time that can be used to
> review other people's submissions.
>
> I am not angry at you but at the same time I can't review your patches if you
> are not ready to help me do so.
Understand. Since one month is a bit long period, I'll post v6 later to avoid
potential conflicts. Or if you could help check this V5 patchset based on
Linux-next/master, that would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Peng.
> >
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Peng.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Peng Fan (8):
> > > > > > dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add fsl,auto-boot property
> > > > > > dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX7ULP support
> > > > > > dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> > > > > > remoteproc: imx_rproc: parse fsl,auto-boot
> > > > > > remoteproc: imx_rproc: initial support for mutilple start/stop
> method
> > > > > > remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional
> > > > > > remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX7ULP
> > > > > > remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> > > > > >
> > > > > > .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 11 +-
> > > > > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 196
> > > > > +++++++++++++++---
> > > > > > 2 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.30.0
> > > > > >
