On 22/04/2021 09:14, Claire Chang wrote:
Add the initialization function to create restricted DMA pools from
matching reserved-memory nodes.
Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/device.h | 4 +++
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 3 +-
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index 38a2071cf776..4987608ea4ff 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ struct dev_links_info {
* @dma_pools: Dma pools (if dma'ble device).
* @dma_mem: Internal for coherent mem override.
* @cma_area: Contiguous memory area for dma allocations
+ * @dma_io_tlb_mem: Internal for swiotlb io_tlb_mem override.
* @archdata: For arch-specific additions.
* @of_node: Associated device tree node.
* @fwnode: Associated device node supplied by platform firmware.
@@ -521,6 +522,9 @@ struct device {
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_CMA
struct cma *cma_area; /* contiguous memory area for dma
allocations */
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+ struct io_tlb_mem *dma_io_tlb_mem;
#endif
/* arch specific additions */
struct dev_archdata archdata;
diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
index 216854a5e513..03ad6e3b4056 100644
--- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force;
* range check to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
* API.
* @nslabs: The number of IO TLB blocks (in groups of 64) between @start and
- * @end. This is command line adjustable via setup_io_tlb_npages.
+ * @end. For default swiotlb, this is command line adjustable via
+ * setup_io_tlb_npages.
* @used: The number of used IO TLB block.
* @list: The free list describing the number of free entries available
* from each index.
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 57a9adb920bf..ffbb8724e06c 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
+#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#endif
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/dma.h>
@@ -681,3 +688,76 @@ static int __init swiotlb_create_default_debugfs(void)
late_initcall(swiotlb_create_default_debugfs);
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
+ struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct io_tlb_mem *mem = rmem->priv;
+ unsigned long nslabs = rmem->size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
+
+ if (dev->dma_io_tlb_mem)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Since multiple devices can share the same pool, the private data,
+ * io_tlb_mem struct, will be initialized by the first device attached
+ * to it.
+ */
+ if (!mem) {
+ mem = kzalloc(struct_size(mem, slots, nslabs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mem)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
+ if (!PageHighMem(pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(rmem->base)))) {
+ kfree(mem);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM */
+ swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, rmem->base, nslabs, false);
+
+ rmem->priv = mem;
+ }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
+ if (!io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs)
+ io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs =
+ debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
At this point it's possible for io_tlb_default_mem to be NULL, leading
to a splat.
But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
being set.
Other than that I gave this series a go with our prototype of Arm's
Confidential Computer Architecture[1] - since the majority of the
guest's memory is protected from the host the restricted DMA pool allows
(only) a small area to be shared with the host.
After fixing (well hacking round) the above it all seems to be working
fine with virtio drivers.
Thanks,
Steve
[1]
https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/security-features/arm-confidential-compute-architecture
