Hi Markus, > >> There are couple of dependent preparatory series. You probably missed >> the following in the cover letter. >>> The series depends on the OMAP mailbox cleanup series [5] and the >>> refreshed OMAP mailbox DT/hwmod cleanup series [2]. >> >> As long as you pick the two dependent series, they apply fine on any of >> the 3.16-rcs. I have posted all the series based on 3.16-rc2. Here's a >> merged branch for your reference (not for pulling though, it has one >> additional commit to allow me to test on OMAP2) >> https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/submit/3.16-rc2-omap-mbox-v8-fwk-v2 >> >> The last 2 patches in the series also depend on the mailbox framework >> patches from Jassi to not throw any build errors if enabled. > > That worked. Thanks for the pointer. FYI, there is a minor merge > conflict rebasing the series onto 3.16-rc5. > > Applying: ARM: OMAP2+: Avoid mailbox legacy device creation for DT-boot > Using index info to reconstruct a base tree... > M arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge... > Auto-merging arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > Failed to merge in the changes. > Patch failed at 0029 ARM: OMAP2+: Avoid mailbox legacy device creation > for DT-boot > > That's due to this commit: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1d29a0722f6c38f79785c9ffb911730598de84e2 OK, thanks, that's because of the removal of the line immediately above the omap_init_mbox() deletion. Anyway, that should be a trivial rebase and the patch contents should remain the same. Once OMAP3 becomes DT-boot only, I will submit a patch to delete the omap_init_mbox(). regards Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
