> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 2:33 PM > To: mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; markgross@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxx; > damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx; dragan.cvetic@xxxxxxxxxx; > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; corbet@xxxxxxx; palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx; > paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx; peng.fan@xxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kelly, Seamus <seamus.kelly@xxxxxxxxx>; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings > > On 2/12/21 2:22 PM, mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) # Copyright (c) > > +Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/misc/intel,keembay-xlink.yaml#"; > > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"; > > + > > +title: Intel Keem Bay xlink > > Is there a specific reason this is dual licensed? If so, can you please include > information about the license choice in the next post's cover letter? > > If there is no specific reason for this contribution to be dual licensed, please make it > GPL-2.0 only. I will. I'm just waiting on some testing before making the next post. Thanks, --mark
