On 20/04/2021 11:10, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > > Le 16/04/2021 à 17:14, Lucas Stach a écrit : >> Am Freitag, dem 16.04.2021 um 15:08 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Gaignard: >>> Le 16/04/2021 à 12:54, Lucas Stach a écrit : >>>> Am Mittwoch, dem 07.04.2021 um 09:35 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Gaignard: >>>>> In order to be able to share the control hardware block between >>>>> VPUs use a syscon instead a ioremap it in the driver. >>>>> To keep the compatibility with older DT if 'nxp,imx8mq-vpu-ctrl' >>>>> phandle is not found look at 'ctrl' reg-name. >>>>> With the method it becomes useless to provide a list of register >>>>> names so remove it. >>>> Sorry for putting a spoke in the wheel after many iterations of the >>>> series. >>>> >>>> We just discussed a way forward on how to handle the clocks and resets >>>> provided by the blkctl block on i.MX8MM and later and it seems there is >>>> a consensus on trying to provide virtual power domains from a blkctl >>>> driver, controlling clocks and resets for the devices in the power >>>> domain. I would like to avoid introducing yet another way of handling >>>> the blkctl and thus would like to align the i.MX8MQ VPU blkctl with >>>> what we are planning to do on the later chip generations. >>>> >>>> CC'ing Jacky Bai and Peng Fan from NXP, as they were going to give this >>>> virtual power domain thing a shot. >>> That could replace the 3 first patches and Dt patche of this series >>> but that will not impact the hevc part, so I wonder if pure hevc patches >>> could be merged anyway ? >>> They are reviewed and don't depend of how the ctrl block is managed. >> I'm not really in a position to give any informed opinion about that >> hvec patches, as I only skimmed them, but I don't see any reason to >> delay patches 04-11 from this series until the i.MX8M platform issues >> are sorted. AFAICS those things are totally orthogonal. > > Hi Hans, > What do you think about this proposal to split this series ? > Get hevc part merged could allow me to continue to add features > like scaling lists, compressed reference buffers and 10-bit supports. Makes sense to me! Regards, Hans
