* Dario Binacchi <dariobin@xxxxxxxxx> [210414 20:40]: > > Il 12/04/2021 09:41 Tero Kristo <kristo@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > The change on the DT itself would be pretty large, removing all clock > > nodes and modifying any existing handles towards the clock nodes, and > > this would impact all OMAP architectures. > > > > Anyways, it is mostly up-to Tony how he wants to see the DT change, as > > he is the maintainer for the OMAP family DT data. While I think all the clocks should use a similar binding to the clkctrl binding, I don't know if it makes sense to start changing things around at such a large scale. Certainly if somebody does the patches and they can be tested to not cause regressions, sure why not :) > > I am just raising the opinion here that from kernel point of view, > > adding the missing size cells seems unnecessary, and I can't see why > > u-boot can't be changed to support the existing broken DT. It is broken > > now, and it will be broken with the addition of the size cells in place, > > and the actual "neat" end result would be to get rid of the clock nodes > > completely. > > I'll fix U-boot. > Thanks for your explanations. > Hope for SSC patch review from you and/or some TI MAINTAINER. Best to fix the issues first, then make any clean-up patches a separate series. Regards, Tony
