Hi, (looks like your email client is still refusing to break lines at 80 columns) Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>one little note. This was for a quick test. I can either remove, keep it >>or complete with the rest of the SPIs in this same patch. Let me know > >>what y'all prefer :-) > > > Yeah, please remove it from this one and send in a separate patch, preferably > adding dmas to all the QUPs :) done > Aaand since I already asked you to re-send, you might as well fix up the > properties order under the nodes (compatible first, then reg, with #dma-cells > somewhere at the bottom) and the unit name (should be "dma-controller@..."). done and done :-) -- balbi
