On 4/15/21 12:10 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
Running "make dtbs_check W=1", some warnings are reported concerning
LTDC port subnode:
/soc/display-controller@5a001000/port:
unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg"
property
/soc/display-controller@5a001000/port: graph node has single child node
'endpoint', #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
btw could you retain diffstat on your patches ? It's useful to see which
files changed right away.
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts
index 2bc92ef3aeb9..19ef475a48fc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts
@@ -82,9 +82,15 @@
};
<dc {
- status = "okay";
-
port {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ ltdc_ep0_out: endpoint@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ remote-endpoint = <&sii9022_in>;
+ };
+
ltdc_ep1_out: endpoint@1 {
reg = <1>;
remote-endpoint = <&dsi_in>;
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtsi
index 64dca5b7f748..e7f10975cacf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtsi
@@ -277,11 +277,7 @@
status = "okay";
port {
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
-
- ltdc_ep0_out: endpoint@0 {
- reg = <0>;
+ ltdc_ep0_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&adv7513_in>;
};
};
I think this is wrong, the AV96 can have two displays connected to two
ports of the LTDC, just like DK2 for example.
