On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:01:53 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote: > The compatible strings below are already in use in the Rockchip > dtsi files, but were somehow never added to a document, so add > > "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" > > "rockchip,rk3036-pwm", "rockchip,rk2928-pwm" > > "rockchip,rk3368-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" > "rockchip,rk3399-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" > > "rockchip,px30-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" > "rockchip,rk3308-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" > > for pwm nodes to pwm-rockchip.yaml. > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Note for rob+dt: > A tag was not added on purpose, because by the change of schema > for clocks and clock-names I add "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" to > the "if:", so strictly speaking V1 and (V2) V3 will not be the same. > Please have a look at it again. > > For some SoC nodes this patch serie generates notifications > for undocumented "interrupts" properties shared between > PWM channels till there is consensus of what to do with it or > someone makes a solution for the whole PWM block. > > Changed V3: > fix mistake with compatibles introduced in V2 > Changed V2: > changed schema for clocks and clock-names > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
