Hello,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 06:34:55AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > > +static int visconti_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct visconti_pwm_chip *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +
> > > + return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip);
> >
> > I think Uwe would prefer this to be done separately because he's working
> > towards removing the return value from pwmchip_remove() and if we start
> > ignoring it in new drivers that will make life easier going forward.
> >
> > So this should just be:
> >
> > pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> I understand your suggestion.
> However, it looks like the pwmchip_remove() hasn't been updated yet.
> I will wait for the update of pwmchip_remove.
pwmchip_remove will always return 0 since b2c200e3f2fd which is in v5.3.
So Thierry's suggestion is safe and indeed welcome.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
