On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:37 PM Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed 07 Apr 10:37 CDT 2021, skakit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > On 2021-03-11 22:33, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > On Thu 11 Mar 01:29 CST 2021, satya priya wrote: > [..] > > > > +patternProperties: > > > > + "rtc@[0-9a-f]+$": > > > > > > Can we somehow link this to individual binding docs instead of listing > > > all the possible functions here? > > > > > > > you mean we should split this into two: > > qcom-pm8xxx.yaml and qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml > > Please correct me if wrong. > > > > Right, I'm worried that it will be quite hard to maintain this document > once we start adding all the various pmic blocks to it. So if we somehow > can maintain a series of qcom-pm8xxx-<func>.yaml and just ref them into > the main PMIC definition. > > @Rob, can you give us some guidance on how to structure this binding, > with the various PMICs described will have some defined subset of a > larger set of hardware blocks that's often shared between versions? How you suggest is good. The only other thing is just 1 complete example rather than a bunch of <func> fragments. Rob
