On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:01 PM Hector Martin <marcan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/04/2021 06.03, Will Deacon wrote: > >> I would rewrite above as > >> > >> void __iomem *ret; > >> > >> ret = ioremap_np(offset, size); > >> if (ret) > >> return ret; > >> > >> return ioremap(offset, size); > > > > Looks like it might be one of those rare occasions where the GCC ternary if > > extension thingy comes in handy: > > > > return ioremap_np(offset, size) ?: ioremap(offset, size); > > Today I learned that this one is kosher in kernel code. Handy! Let's go > with that. It depends on the maintainer. Greg, for example, doesn't like this. I have no strong opinion (I use both variants on case-by-case basis), though I think in headers better to spell out all conditionals clearly. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko