On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:08:18PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:48:17PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > > Add devicetree binding for the Actions Semi Owl socinfo driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/soc/actions/owl-socinfo.yaml | 57 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/actions/owl-socinfo.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/actions/owl-socinfo.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/actions/owl-socinfo.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..01e4a8b4f5ac > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/actions/owl-socinfo.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/actions/owl-socinfo.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > + > > +title: Actions Semi Owl SoC info module > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@xxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +description: | > > + Actions Semi Owl SoC info module provides access to various information > > + about the S500, S700 and S900 SoC variants, such as serial number or id. > > + > > +select: > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + contains: > > + enum: > > + - actions,s500-soc > > + - actions,s700-soc > > + - actions,s900-soc > > + required: > > + - compatible > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - actions,s500-soc > > + - actions,s700-soc > > + - actions,s900-soc > > + - const: simple-bus > > + > > +required: > > + - compatible > > + > > +additionalProperties: true > > + > > +examples: > > + - | > > + / { > > + compatible = "roseapplepi,roseapplepi", "actions,s500"; > > + model = "Roseapple Pi"; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + > > + soc { > > + compatible = "actions,s500-soc", "simple-bus"; > > What's the actual h/w for this bus? Still looks like abuse of DT to > create your virtual soc_info driver. Right, there is no bus involved in accessing soc info, but I assumed the already existing soc node in common DTS is a good candidate for binding the driver. (e.g. arch/arm/boot/dts/owl-s500.dtsi) Should I, instead, create a dedicated sub-node? Thanks, Cristi > > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > +... > > -- > > 2.31.1 > >