On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:46:35AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > For motorola modem case, we may have a GNSS device on channel 4. > > > > Let's add that to the binding and example. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/serdev/serdev-ngsm.yaml | 9 +++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > > And since we're describing a mux, I think you need nodes for the virtual > > ports rather than a reg property in what should be a serial client. That > > is something like > > > > serial@nnn { > > modem { > > compatible = "etsi,ts27001-mux"; > > > > serial@4 { > > compatible = "etsi,ts27001-serial"; > > reg = <4>; > > > > gnss { > > compatible = "motorola,motmdm-gnss"; > > }; > > }; > > }; > > }; > > > > This way you can actually use serdev for the client drivers (e.g. for > > gnss), and those drivers also be used for non-muxed ports if needed > > (e.g. over USB). > > I have done changes you requested, and then hit "serdev is busy > because it can have at most one child" limit in the code. You have > pretty clean driver in your inbox, and no reply. No help with serdev > core limitations, either. Can you start to communicate? Heh, look at the devicetree example above that I gave you back in March. It has the virtual serial ports described ("serial@4"), which you were missing. Johan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature