On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:56:44PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 30.03.2021 18:29, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > > 30.03.2021 11:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski пишет: > >>> + power-domains: > >>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > >>> + description: > >>> + Phandle of the SoC "core" power domain. > >> I think the core checks the type, so you only need to limit max items. > >> > > > > It's a bit confusing that both variants work and it's not apparent what > > variant is better. Soon '$ref' won't work. I have a pending meta-schema change to catch this. It takes some time because I have to fix all the existing cases in tree and wait a cycle so I'm not breaking everyone. > > > > I actually used the max items limit initially and then changed it to > > $ref phandle because it appeared to me that it's a better choice. I'll > > switch back to the limit in v2, thanks. > > > > Although, I'm still not sure what is the best variant. Could you please > clarify why maxItems is better? > > Seems the $ref phandle already limits domain items to 1. So I don't > understand what's the difference. It would not work with '<&domain 1>' as 'phandle' doesn't accept any arg cells. While you may know you don't have any cells, technically that's provider dependent and outside the scope of this binding. Rob
