Hi Tianling,
CC Jacek, Pavel
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:00 PM Tianling Shen <cnsztl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2021-03-16 02:23 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Personally, I'm not so fond of the <foo>-%u node names, and prefer
> > <foo>-<function>. With the former, it's way too easy to have a silent
> > override in your .dts(i) stack.
> > Cfr. commit 45f5d5a9e34d3fe4 ("arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: draak:
> > Fix backlight regulator name")
>
> How about using `lan-led`, `sys-led` and `wan-led` here?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml says "led-%u"
is the preferred form, but that anything containing "led" as a substring
is accepted. So I'd go for "led-lan" etc.
BTW, you can validate your DTB against the leds-gpio DT bindings
by running:
make dtbs_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml
Background info for CCed parties:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210316150033.15987-1-cnsztl@xxxxxxxxx/
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
