Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-cells compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10.03.2021 23:47, Ansuel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
See inline

On 10.03.2021 22:08, Ansuel Smith wrote:
Document nvmem-cells compatible used to treat mtd partitions as a
nvmem provider.

Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   .../bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml  | 96 +++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f70d7597a6b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Nvmem cells
+
+description: |
+  Any partition containing the compatible "nvmem-cells" will register as a
+  nvmem provider.
+  Each direct subnodes represents a nvmem cell following the nvmem binding.
+  Nvmem binding to declare nvmem-cells can be found in:
+  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
+
+maintainers:
+  - Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>

I think that when Rob wrote:

On 10.03.2021 03:58, Rob Herring wrote:
I think this should reference nvmem.yaml.

he meant you using:

allOf:
   - $ref: "nvmem.yaml#"

(you'll need to adjust binding path).

Please check how it's done in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/*.yaml files



Aside from that, should I readd the old properties or I can keep the
compatible as the only one required?

What old properties do you mean?

You shouldn't need to add anything to the list of "required" I think.

Some NVMEM providers add "#address-cells" and "#size-cells". That makes
sense if NVMEM provider must provide at least 1 cell. I'm not sure if we
need that for MTD.

Even "compatible" is actually redundant but most YAML files list it for
convenience. Source:

On 10.12.2020 03:48, Rob Herring wrote:
> And drop 'compatible' as required. It's redundant anyways because the
> schema will only be applied if compatible matches.

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2020-December/084574.html
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/comment/2597326/



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux