On Sat 06 Mar 02:00 CST 2021, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:56:02PM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Fri 05 Mar 19:28 CST 2021, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:43:08PM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > > On Tue 02 Mar 21:31 CST 2021, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > > > > > > The last cell of 'gpio-ranges' should be number of GPIO pins, and in > > > > > case of qcom platform it should match msm_pinctrl_soc_data.ngpio rather > > > > > than msm_pinctrl_soc_data.ngpio - 1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a historical artifact, SDM845 has 150 GPIO pins. In addition to > > > > this there's an output-only pin for UFS, which I exposed as an GPIO as > > > > well - but it's only supposed to be used as a reset-gpio for the UFS > > > > device. > > > > > > > > Perhaps that still mandates that gpio-ranges should cover it? > > > > > > I think the number in DT gpio-ranges should match msm_pinctrl_soc_data.ngpio. > > > Otherwise, kernel will be confused and be running into the issue like > > > below in some case. > > > > > > > > > > > > This fixes the problem that when the last GPIO pin in the range is > > > > > configured with the following call sequence, it always fails with > > > > > -EPROBE_DEFER. > > > > > > > > > > pinctrl_gpio_set_config() > > > > > pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range() > > > > > pinctrl_match_gpio_range() > > > > > > > > When do we hit this sequence? I didn't think operations on the UFS > > > > GP(I)O would ever take this code path? > > > > > > It will, if we have UFS driver booting from ACPI and requesting reset > > > GPIO. > > > > But does the UFS driver somehow request GPIO 190 on SC8180x? > > > > I made up the idea that this is a GPIO, there really only is 190 (0-189) > > GPIOs on thie SoC. > > > > Downstream they use a pinconf node with "output-high"/"output-low" to > > toggle the reset pin and I don't find any references in the Flex 5G > > DSDT. > > Right now, I do not have to request and configure this UFS GPIO for > getting UFS work with ACPI kernel. And the immediate problem we have is > that with gpio_chip .set_config patch, devm_gpiod_get_optional() call > from UFS driver always gets -EPROBE_DEFER. > But we don't have a "reset" GPIO specified in the ACPI node, or you mean with the introduction of .set_config DT no longer works? Regards, Bjorn > > > > > And we are hit this sequence with my patch that adds .set_config > > > for gpio_chip [1]. > > > > > > > What's calling pinctrl_gpio_set_config() in this case? > > ufs_qcom_probe > ufshcd_pltfrm_init > ufshcd_init > ufs_qcom_init > devm_gpiod_get_optional > devm_gpiod_get_index > gpiod_get_index > gpiod_configure_flags > gpiod_direction_output > gpiochip_generic_config > > Shawn
