Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmhsc: Add rockchip support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2021/3/10 15:00, Johan Jonker wrote:
On 3/10/21 4:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:56:29AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
This patch adds rockchip support in sdhci-of-dwcmhsc.yaml

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v3: None

  .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml           | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
index f99fb9f..43989f2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ allOf:
  properties:
    compatible:
      enum:

+      - rockchip,dwcmshc-sdhci

Compatible strings are supposed to be SoC orientated.
What SoC was this change for? rk3568 ?
Could Shawn confirm that?

Yes. We are inclined to use this controller from now on for a
long time for up-coming SoCs. Should we tag compatible for rk3568
specified? One of the negative things I could come up with is that we
do this for dwmmc-rockchip, but we end up doing nothing else,
except for adding new compatible string again and again in Document.


          - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc-sdhci ??

Could Rob advise here?

        - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci
reg:
@@ -31,12 +32,24 @@ properties:
      items:
        - description: core clock
        - description: bus clock for optional
+      - description: axi clock for rockchip specified
+      - description: block clock for rockchip specified
+      - description: timer clock for rockchip specified
+
clock-names:
      minItems: 1
      items:
        - const: core
        - const: bus
+      - const: axi
+      - const: block
+      - const: timer
+
+  rockchip,txclk-tapnum:
+    description: Specify the number of delay for tx sampling.
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32

Constraints for this? 0 - 2^32 is okay?

+
required:
    - compatible
@@ -49,6 +62,17 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
examples:
    - |
+    mmc@fe310000 {

+      compatible = "rockchip,dwcmshc-sdhci";

       compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc-sdhci"; ??

+      reg = <0xfe310000 0x10000>;
+      interrupts = <0 25 0x4>;
+      clocks = <&cru 17>, <&cru 18>, <&cru 19>, <&cru 20>, <&cru 21>;
+      clock-names = "core", "bus", "axi", "block", "timer";
+      bus-width = <8>;
+      #address-cells = <1>;
+      #size-cells = <0>;
+    };
+  - |
      mmc@aa0000 {
        compatible = "snps,dwcmshc-sdhci";
        reg = <0xaa000 0x1000>;
--
2.7.4














[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux