(Cc'ing Hans.)
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> @@ -482,6 +482,13 @@ void ahci_save_initial_config(struct device *dev,
> port_map &= mask_port_map;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If port_map was filled automatically when finding port sub-nodes,
> + * make sure we get the right set here.
> + */
> + if (hpriv->port_map)
> + port_map &= hpriv->port_map;
> +
So, hpriv->port is both input and output? This is messy and can lead
to confusing failures and there now are multiple ways to modify
port_map. If carrying this information through ahci_host_priv is
necessary, let's remove the direct params and introduce new input
fields to the struct.
> /**
> + * ahci_platform_enable_phys - Enable PHYs
> + * @hpriv: host private area to store config values
> + *
> + * This function enables all the PHYs found in hpriv->phys, if any.
> + * If a PHY fails to be enabled, it disables all the PHYs already
> + * enabled in reverse order and returns an error.
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * 0 on success otherwise a negative error code
> + */
> +int ahci_platform_enable_phys(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
> +{
> + int i, rc = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < hpriv->nphys; i++) {
> + rc = phy_init(hpriv->phys[i]);
> + if (rc)
> + goto disable_phys;
> +
> + rc = phy_power_on(hpriv->phys[i]);
> + if (rc) {
> + phy_exit(hpriv->phys[i]);
> + goto disable_phys;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +disable_phys:
> + while (--i >= 0) {
> + phy_power_off(hpriv->phys[i]);
> + phy_exit(hpriv->phys[i]);
> + }
> + return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ahci_platform_enable_phys);
Do we need to make hpriv->phys[] dynamically allocated? We already
have hpriv->clks[AHCI_MAX_CLKS] and it's unlikely that we're gonna
need more than several phys per host. Let's go with a simpler fixed
array.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
