Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:57:09PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Le 03/03/2021 à 18:46, Will Deacon a écrit :
>> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> > > Le 03/03/2021 à 18:28, Will Deacon a écrit :
>> > > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:25:17PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> > > > > This code provides architectures with a way to build command line
>> > > > > based on what is built in the kernel and what is handed over by the
>> > > > > bootloader, based on selected compile-time options.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > > include/linux/cmdline.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > > > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>> > > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/cmdline.h
>> > > > >
>> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/cmdline.h b/include/linux/cmdline.h
>> > > > > new file mode 100644
>> > > > > index 000000000000..ae3610bb0ee2
>> > > > > --- /dev/null
>> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/cmdline.h
>> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
>> > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> > > > > +#ifndef _LINUX_CMDLINE_H
>> > > > > +#define _LINUX_CMDLINE_H
>> > > > > +
>> > > > > +static __always_inline size_t cmdline_strlen(const char *s)
>> > > > > +{
>> > > > > + const char *sc;
>> > > > > +
>> > > > > + for (sc = s; *sc != '\0'; ++sc)
>> > > > > + ; /* nothing */
>> > > > > + return sc - s;
>> > > > > +}
>> > > > > +
>> > > > > +static __always_inline size_t cmdline_strlcat(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count)
>> > > > > +{
>> > > > > + size_t dsize = cmdline_strlen(dest);
>> > > > > + size_t len = cmdline_strlen(src);
>> > > > > + size_t res = dsize + len;
>> > > > > +
>> > > > > + /* This would be a bug */
>> > > > > + if (dsize >= count)
>> > > > > + return count;
>> > > > > +
>> > > > > + dest += dsize;
>> > > > > + count -= dsize;
>> > > > > + if (len >= count)
>> > > > > + len = count - 1;
>> > > > > + memcpy(dest, src, len);
>> > > > > + dest[len] = 0;
>> > > > > + return res;
>> > > > > +}
>> > > >
>> > > > Why are these needed instead of using strlen and strlcat directly?
>> > >
>> > > Because on powerpc (at least), it will be used in prom_init, it is very
>> > > early in the boot and KASAN shadow memory is not set up yet so calling
>> > > generic string functions would crash the board.
>> >
>> > Hmm. We deliberately setup a _really_ early shadow on arm64 for this, can
>> > you not do something similar? Failing that, I think it would be better to
>> > offer the option for an arch to implement cmdline_*, but have then point to
>> > the normal library routines by default.
>>
>> I don't think it is possible to setup an earlier early shadow.
>>
>> At the point we are in prom_init, the code is not yet relocated at the
>> address it was linked for, and it is running with the MMU set by the
>> bootloader, I can't imagine being able to setup MMU entries for the early
>> shadow KASAN yet without breaking everything.
>
> That's very similar to us; we're not relocated, although we are at least
> in control of the MMU (which is using a temporary set of page-tables).
prom_init runs as an OF client, with the MMU off (except on some Apple
machines), and we don't own the MMU. So there's really nothing we can do :)
Though now that I look at it, I don't think we should be doing this
level of commandline handling in prom_init. It should just grab the
value from firmware and pass it to the kernel proper, and then all the
prepend/append/force etc. logic should happen there.
cheers
