Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2021-03-03 04:17:49)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 4a56d9c..21c2399 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -30,6 +31,18 @@
> };
> };
>
> + reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
Do we plan to use this label at any point? I'd prefer we remove this
until it becomes useful.
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + aop_cmd_db_mem: memory@80860000 {
> + reg = <0x0 0x80860000 0x0 0x20000>;
> + compatible = "qcom,cmd-db";
> + no-map;
> + };
> + };
> +
> cpus {
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> @@ -203,6 +229,7 @@
> interrupt-controller;
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 175>;
> + wakeup-parent = <&pdc>;
>
> qup_uart5_default: qup-uart5-default {
> pins = "gpio46", "gpio47";
> @@ -287,6 +314,23 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
> };
> +
> + apps_rsc: rsc@18200000 {
Any better name than 'rsc'? Maybe 'power-controller'?
> + compatible = "qcom,rpmh-rsc";
> + reg = <0 0x18200000 0 0x10000>,
> + <0 0x18210000 0 0x10000>,
> + <0 0x18220000 0 0x10000>;
> + reg-names = "drv-0", "drv-1", "drv-2";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + qcom,tcs-offset = <0xd00>;
> + qcom,drv-id = <2>;
> + qcom,tcs-config = <ACTIVE_TCS 2>,
> + <SLEEP_TCS 3>,
> + <WAKE_TCS 3>,
> + <CONTROL_TCS 1>;
> + };
> };
