Hi Philipp, On 07 July 2014 @ 09:07 Philipp Zabel wrote: >Hi Steve, >Am Freitag, den 04.07.2014, 12:52 +0000 schrieb Opensource [Steve >Twiss]: >> >Subject: [PATCH] of: Add vendor prefix for Dialog Semiconductor Plc >> >Add Dialog Semiconductor Plc to the list of device tree vendor prefixes. >> >Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >--- >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> >b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> >index 9ab11e0..be47d1a 100644 >> >--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> >+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> >@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ dallas Maxim Integrated Products (formerly Dallas >> >Semiconductor) >> > davicom DAVICOM Semiconductor, Inc. >> > denx Denx Software Engineering >> > digi Digi International Inc. >> >+dlgnf Dialog Semiconductor Plc >> >> This discussion has been in progress for a while now. >> There are already pending changes for the vendor prefix Dialog Semiconductor. >> >> Please see the conversations here with Rob Herring: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/11/262 >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/11/199 > >Thank you, I haven't seen those. So is it going to be 'dlg' then? >Is this already queued somewhere? It doesn't seem to have made it >into linux-next yet. A patch was sent for Dialog DA9150 but it has not yet made it into linux-next: 'dlg' is our chosen prefix and this is most commonly used throughout the kernel. Also Rob Herring has agreed with this decision when reviewing the previous attempted submission. However, I will put together a patch set that uses 'dlg' and 'mark the others deprecated' as requested. I will send this as a "request for comment" to the maintainers and hopefully sort out this mismatch. Regards, Steve ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
