Hi Benjamin,
On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 09:02 +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Add HEVC decode params and scaling matrix controls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> index 016cf6204cbb..5e45333fd862 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> @@ -1028,6 +1028,8 @@ const char *v4l2_ctrl_get_name(u32 id)
> case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_SPS: return "HEVC Sequence Parameter Set";
> case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_PPS: return "HEVC Picture Parameter Set";
> case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_SLICE_PARAMS: return "HEVC Slice Parameters";
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_DECODE_PARAMS: return "HEVC Decode Parameters";
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_SCALING_MATRIX: return "HEVC Scaling Matrix";
I would move all the SCALING_MATRIX changes to their own patches.
> case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_DECODE_MODE: return "HEVC Decode Mode";
> case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_START_CODE: return "HEVC Start Code";
>
> @@ -1482,6 +1484,12 @@ void v4l2_ctrl_fill(u32 id, const char **name, enum v4l2_ctrl_type *type,
> case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_SLICE_PARAMS:
> *type = V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_HEVC_SLICE_PARAMS;
> break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_DECODE_PARAMS:
> + *type = V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_HEVC_DECODE_PARAMS;
> + break;
> + case V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_HEVC_SCALING_MATRIX:
> + *type = V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_HEVC_SCALING_MATRIX;
> + break;
> case V4L2_CID_UNIT_CELL_SIZE:
> *type = V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_AREA;
> *flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
> @@ -1833,6 +1841,7 @@ static int std_validate_compound(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, u32 idx,
> struct v4l2_ctrl_hevc_sps *p_hevc_sps;
> struct v4l2_ctrl_hevc_pps *p_hevc_pps;
> struct v4l2_ctrl_hevc_slice_params *p_hevc_slice_params;
> + struct v4l2_ctrl_hevc_decode_params *p_hevc_decode_params;
> struct v4l2_area *area;
> void *p = ptr.p + idx * ctrl->elem_size;
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -2108,26 +2117,33 @@ static int std_validate_compound(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, u32 idx,
> zero_padding(*p_hevc_pps);
> break;
>
> - case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_HEVC_SLICE_PARAMS:
> - p_hevc_slice_params = p;
> + case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_HEVC_DECODE_PARAMS:
> + p_hevc_decode_params = p;
>
> - if (p_hevc_slice_params->num_active_dpb_entries >
> + if (p_hevc_decode_params->num_active_dpb_entries >
I suspect this change should be squashed with the patch that moves
num_active_dpb_entries from the slice control, or otherwise
this code won't compile.
> V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRIES_NUM_MAX)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - zero_padding(p_hevc_slice_params->pred_weight_table);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < p_hevc_slice_params->num_active_dpb_entries;
> + for (i = 0; i < p_hevc_decode_params->num_active_dpb_entries;
> i++) {
> struct v4l2_hevc_dpb_entry *dpb_entry =
> - &p_hevc_slice_params->dpb[i];
> + &p_hevc_decode_params->dpb[i];
>
Ditto.
Thanks,
Ezequiel
