On 2/16/21 11:54 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:25, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:The driver already has support for sm8150/sm8250, but the compatibles were never added. Also inverse the non-mdp4 condition in add_display_components() to avoid having to check every new compatible in the condition. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt index 551ae26f60da..5763f43200a0 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The DPU display controller is found in SDM845 SoC. MDSS: Required properties: -- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-mdss", "qcom,sc7180-mdss" +- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-mdss", "qcom,sc7180-mdss", "qcom,sm8150-mdss", "qcom,sm8250-mdss" - reg: physical base address and length of contoller's registers. - reg-names: register region names. The following region is required: * "mdss" @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Optional properties: MDP: Required properties: -- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-dpu", "qcom,sc7180-dpu" +- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-dpu", "qcom,sc7180-dpu", "qcom,sm8150-dpu", "qcom,sm8250-dpu" - reg: physical base address and length of controller's registers. - reg-names : register region names. The following region is required: * "mdp"These two chunks should probably go to the separate patch 'dt-bindings:...'.
In this case I think its better to have this change in the same patch, but maybe one of the Robs will disagree.
Also, could you please pinpoint the reason for adding more compatibility strings, while they map to the same internal data? I think we might want instead to use some generic name for the dpu block, like "qcom,dpu" or "qcom,mdp-dpu" instead of specifying the platform name.
sdm845 and sc7180 aren't using generic compatibles, this is just being consistent with that.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c index 5a8e3e1fc48c..fff12a4c8bfc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c @@ -1219,6 +1219,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops dpu_pm_ops = { static const struct of_device_id dpu_dt_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dpu", }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-dpu", }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dpu", }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dpu", }, {} }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dpu_dt_match); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c index 94525ac76d4e..928f13d4bfbc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c @@ -1185,9 +1185,7 @@ static int add_display_components(struct device *dev, * Populate the children devices, find the MDP5/DPU node, and then add * the interfaces to our components list. */ - if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,mdss") || - of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sdm845-mdss") || - of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7180-mdss")) { + if (!of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,mdp4")) { ret = of_platform_populate(dev->of_node, NULL, NULL, dev); if (ret) { DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to populate children devices\n"); @@ -1320,6 +1318,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id dt_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_MDP5 }, { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU }, {} }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dt_match); -- 2.26.1
