On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:48:51PM +0200, stefanc@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static bool mvpp2_port_supports_xlg(struct mvpp2_port *port)
>
> static bool mvpp2_port_supports_rgmii(struct mvpp2_port *port)
> {
> - return !(port->priv->hw_version == MVPP22 && port->gop_id == 0);
> + return !(port->priv->hw_version != MVPP21 && port->gop_id == 0);
I'm still very much of the opinion (as raised several revisions back)
that using > MVPP21 or >= MVPP22 would be a lot better - especially
when we have situations like this. Having negatives within negatives
does not help readability.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
