On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:16 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Bartosz, > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:33 AM Bartosz Golaszewski > <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven > > <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM Wolfram Sang > > > <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus > > > > > EEPROM. > > > > > > > > What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback > > > > of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm > > > > handling somewhen)? > > > > > > Good question. The datasheets look similar. > > > Parametric search on rohm.com says the G-series differs in using > > > "Cu wire bonding". > > > > I'm fine with the current form as it's simpler than using two > > fallbacks. Do you want to submit another version anyway or can I pick > > it up? > > If you're happy with it, then I'm happy, too ;-) > Thanks! > Applied, thanks! Bartosz
