Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for Siemens IOT2050 boards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan,

A few quick scan comments below, you might need to post based off
5.12-rc1 once available..

Also, I see a bit of warnings with dtbs_check, which probably needs a
little more digging into (pcie insists to get a device_type property,
etc..)

you could use kernel_patch_verify or https://github.com/nmenon/kernel_patch_verify/blob/master/Dockerbuild.md

it throws up a report like this https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/SdkZr432z3/

So, many of my comments below are just first pass parse of that log -> I
usually do recommend building with W=2 and dtbs_check (with yamlint etc)
to make sure things are a bit sane. Will be good to have additional
eyes.

On 11:21-20210209, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add support for two Siemens SIMATIC IOT2050 variants, Basic and
> Advanced. They are based on the TI AM6528 and AM6548 SOCs.
> 
> Based on original version by Le Jin.

Might be good to add links to the boards as well (if available), for
future reference.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Will be nice to see at least a pastebin link for a bootlog on the boards
in the cover-letter / diffstat section with the v2 - for reference.

>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml        |   2 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile               |   4 +
>  .../boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi   | 649 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../boot/dts/ti/k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dts   |  56 ++
>  .../dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts     |  57 ++
>  5 files changed, 768 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> index c6e1c1e63e43..b1ab0cf4a2d6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ properties:
>          items:
>            - enum:
>                - ti,am654-evm
> +              - siemens,iot2050-basic
> +              - siemens,iot2050-advanced

- In a separate patch, ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml -> Could you
  make sure we add 'siemens' there?
- and, lets move the bindings to it's own patch, since that is how Rob
 prefers to review in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/list/

Both of these patches will need Rob to ack. I think I should be able
to pick the first one up as well to reduce dependency, but we can
check with Rob in case there is a preference.

>            - const: ti,am654
>  
>        - description: K3 J721E SoC
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
> index 65506f21ba30..928ea26ce250 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
>  
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am654-base-board.dtb
>  

- drop the EOL to club am65 dtbs close to each other

> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dtb
> +

- Drop this EOL as well. Something like this:

dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am654-base-board.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dtb

dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dtb

> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dtb
> +
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dtb
>  
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..de05937dbb60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,649 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) Siemens AG, 2018-2021
> + *

Optional: might be nice to add a oneliner comment for reuse scope..

> + * Authors:
> + *   Le Jin <le.jin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "k3-am654.dtsi"
> +#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	aliases {
> +		spi0 = &mcu_spi0;
> +	};
> +
> +	chosen {
> +		stdout-path = "serial3:115200n8";
> +		bootargs = "earlycon=ns16550a,mmio32,0x02800000";

serial3 is main_uart1, did you mean 0x02810000 instead of 0x02800000 ?

> +	};
> +
> +	reserved-memory {
> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		secure_ddr: secure_ddr@9e800000 {

"_" is not something we prefer for node names, so something like
	secure_ddr: secure-ddr@...

> +			reg = <0 0x9e800000 0 0x01800000>; /* for OP-TEE */
> +			alignment = <0x1000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +
> +		mcu_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a0000000 {
> +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +			reg = <0 0xa0000000 0 0x100000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +
> +		mcu_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: r5f-memory@a0100000 {
> +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +			reg = <0 0xa0100000 0 0xf00000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +
> +		mcu_r5fss0_core1_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a1000000 {
> +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +			reg = <0 0xa1000000 0 0x100000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +
> +		mcu_r5fss0_core1_memory_region: r5f-memory@a1100000 {
> +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +			reg = <0 0xa1100000 0 0xf00000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +
> +		rtos_ipc_memory_region: ipc-memories@a2000000 {
> +			reg = <0x00 0xa2000000 0x00 0x00200000>;
> +			alignment = <0x1000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	gpio_leds {

just 'leds'?

> +		compatible = "gpio-leds";
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&leds_pins_default>;
> +
> +		status-led-red {
> +			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 32 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +			panic-indicator;
> +			linux,default-trigger = "gpio";
> +		};
> +
> +		status-led-green {
> +			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +			linux,default-trigger = "gpio";
> +		};
> +
> +		user-led1-red {
> +			gpios = <&pcal9535_3 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +			linux,default-trigger = "gpio";
> +		};
> +
> +		user-led1-green {
> +			gpios = <&pcal9535_2 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +			linux,default-trigger = "gpio";
> +		};
> +
> +		user-led2-red {
> +			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +			linux,default-trigger = "gpio";
> +		};
> +
> +		user-led2-green {
> +			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 22 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +			linux,default-trigger = "gpio";

are you sure this is "gpio" ? dtbs_check reports should be one of:
	['backlight', 'default-on', 'heartbeat', 'disk-activity', 'ide-disk', 'timer', 'pattern']
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	dp_refclk: clock {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		clock-frequency = <19200000>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&wkup_pmx0 {
> +	wkup_i2c0_pins_default: wkup_i2c0_pins_default {

	Here, and else where:
		wkup_i2c0_pins_default: wkup-i2c0-pins-default

Prefer we dont use _ in node names (rest of the pinmux node names as
		well).

> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			AM65X_WKUP_IOPAD(0x00e0, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (AC7) WKUP_I2C0_SCL */
> +			AM65X_WKUP_IOPAD(0x00e4, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (AD6) WKUP_I2C0_SDA */
> +		>;
> +	};
> +
> +	mcu_i2c0_pins_default: mcu_i2c0_pins_default {
> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0070, PIN_INPUT,  5)  /* (R25) I2C2_SDA */

[... similar issues with '_' elsewhere.. ]

> +		>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&main_pmx1 {
> +	main_i2c0_pins_default: main-i2c0-pins-default {

	these look fine..

> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0000, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (D20) I2C0_SCL */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0004, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (C21) I2C0_SDA */
> +		>;
> +	};
> +
> +	main_i2c1_pins_default: main-i2c1-pins-default {
> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0008, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (B21) I2C1_SCL */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x000c, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (E21) I2C1_SDA */
> +		>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ecap0_pins_default: ecap0-pins-default {
> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0010, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (D21) ECAP0_IN_APWM_OUT */
> +		>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&wkup_uart0 {
> +	/* Wakeup UART is used by System firmware */
> +	status = "disabled";
In case of reservation for firmware usage:
status = "reserved";

[...]

> +
> +&wkup_gpio0 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <
> +		&arduino_io_d2_to_d3_pins_default
> +		&arduino_i2c_aio_switch_pins_default
> +		&arduino_io_oe_pins_default
> +		&push_button_pins_default
> +		&db9_com_mode_pins_default
> +	>;
> +	gpio-line-names =
> +		"wkup_gpio0-base", "", "", "", "UART0-mode1", "UART0-mode0",
> +			"UART0-enable", "UART0-terminate", "", "WIFI-disable",
> +		"", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "",
> +		"", "A4A5-I2C-mux", "", "", "", "USER-button", "", "", "","IO0",
> +		"IO1", "IO2", "", "IO3", "IO17-direction",
> +			"A5", "IO16-direction", "IO15-direction",
> +			"IO14-direction", "A3",
> +		"", "IO18-direction", "A4", "A2", "A1",
> +			"A0", "", "", "IO13", "IO11",
> +		"IO12", "IO10";

Any chance of intending this consistently?

> +};
> +
> +&wkup_i2c0 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_i2c0_pins_default>;
> +	clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +};
> +
> +&mcu_i2c0 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_i2c0_pins_default>;
> +	clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +
> +	psu: tps62363@60 {
> +		compatible = "ti,tps62363";
> +		reg =  <0x60>;
> +		regulator-name = "tps62363-vout";
> +		regulator-min-microvolt = <500000>;
> +		regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
> +		regulator-boot-on;
> +		/* ti,vsel0-gpio = <&gpio1 16 0>; */
> +		/* ti,vsel1-gpio = <&gpio1 17 0>; */

Could you drop the commented out properties: above and later?

> +		ti,vsel0-state-high;
> +		ti,vsel1-state-high;
> +		/* ti,enable-pull-down; */
> +		/* ti,enable-force-pwm; */
> +		ti,enable-vout-discharge;
> +	};
> +
> +	/*D4200*/
Add a space prefix and postfix? (here and below)
/* D4200 */

> +	pcal9535_1: gpio@20 {
> +		compatible = "nxp,pcal9535";
> +		reg = <0x20>;
> +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +		gpio-line-names =
> +			"A0-pull", "A1-pull", "A2-pull", "A3-pull", "A4-pull",
> +			"A5-pull", "", "",
> +			"IO14-enable", "IO15-enable", "IO16-enable",
> +			"IO17-enable", "IO18-enable", "IO19-enable";
> +	};
> +
> +	/*D4201*/
> +	pcal9535_2: gpio@21 {
> +		compatible = "nxp,pcal9535";
> +		reg = <0x21>;
> +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +		gpio-line-names =
> +			"IO0-direction", "IO1-direction", "IO2-direction",
> +			"IO3-direction", "IO4-direction", "IO5-direction",
> +			"IO6-direction", "IO7-direction",
> +			"IO8-direction", "IO9-direction", "IO10-direction",
> +			"IO11-direction", "IO12-direction", "IO13-direction",
> +			"IO19-direction";
> +	};
> +

	[...]

> +
> +&pcie1_rc {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&minipcie_pins_default>;
> +
> +	num-lanes = <1>;
> +	phys = <&serdes1 PHY_TYPE_PCIE 0>;
> +	phy-names = "pcie-phy0";
> +	reset-gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 27 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;

schema seems to want a device_type, and there seems to be some warnings
	on serdes as well.. might be something to check up on..

> +};
> +
> +&pcie1_ep {
> +	status = "disabled";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bb9ab4fdd74e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) Siemens AG, 2018-2021
> + *

Will be nice to explain the difference between basic and advanced dts.

Are they two different boards? looks like the basic is using a part spin
with a single cluster, perhaps? I guess links might help..

> + * Authors:
> + *   Le Jin <le.jin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +	compatible = "siemens,iot2050-basic", "ti,am654";
> +	model = "SIMATIC IOT2050 Basic";
> +
> +	memory@80000000 {
> +		device_type = "memory";
> +		/* 1G RAM */
> +		reg = <0x00000000 0x80000000 0x00000000 0x40000000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		cpu-map {
> +			/delete-node/ cluster1;
> +		};
> +		/delete-node/ cpu@100;
> +		/delete-node/ cpu@101;
> +	};

Personally, I'd prefer this (handling efuse spins in board files or
even overlays) instead of having to create 100s of dtsi per SoC for
every permutation & combination of TI efused devices and handle these
in board files. I do see examples of similar usage elsewhere in:

$ git grep /delete-node/ arch/arm64/boot/dts/

But, if someone has a different opinion, feel free to pipe up with a
reasonable way to prevent file explosion.

> +};
> +
> +/* eMMC */
> +&sdhci0 {
> +	status = "disabled";
> +};
> +
> +&main_pmx0 {
> +	main_uart0_pins_default: main_uart0_pins_default {
> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x01e4, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (AF11) UART0_RXD */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x01e8, PIN_OUTPUT, 0)  /* (AE11) UART0_TXD */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x01ec, PIN_INPUT,  0)  /* (AG11) UART0_CTSn */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x01f0, PIN_OUTPUT, 0)  /* (AD11) UART0_RTSn */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0188, PIN_INPUT,  1)  /* (D25) UART0_DCDn */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x018c, PIN_INPUT,  1)  /* (B26) UART0_DSRn */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0190, PIN_OUTPUT, 1)  /* (A24) UART0_DTRn */
> +			AM65X_IOPAD(0x0194, PIN_INPUT,  1)  /* (E24) UART0_RIN */
> +		>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&main_uart0 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&main_uart0_pins_default>;
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..aa1ef081ef22
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) Siemens AG, 2018-2021
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + *   Le Jin <le.jin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi"
[...]

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux