On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:55:07PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 05-02-21, 10:02, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Viresh, > > > > Thanks for your patch > > (which I only noticed because it appeared in dt-rh/for-next ;-) > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:31 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Add support for building DT overlays (%.dtbo). The overlay's source file > > > will have the usual extension, i.e. .dts, though the blob will have > > > > Why use .dts and not .dtso for overlays? > > Because you originally (until v5) had a single rule for building .dtb > > and .dtbo files? > > I am fine with doing that as well if Rob and David agree to it. Rob > did suggest that at one point but we didn't do much about it later on > for some reason. > > FWIW, this will also require a change in the DTC compiler. Not really. It would need a change to automatically recognize that extension, but you can easily work around that by explicitly giving the -I option to specify the input type. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
