On 2/3/21 7:04 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 05:01:26PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:51:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> Thinking about it, would it make make sense to define the functions as >>> static inline ? >> >> I (and I believe Guenter too) > > s/I believe Guenter too/I thought you too/ > Oops, you are correct. I somehow thought the structure holding the variable was defined in an include file. Sorry, my bad. Please ignore the noise I am making. Guenter >> want to keep these structures protected >> for now. If the API starts to get too bloated, then I guess I have to >> reconsider that. But I don't think we are there yet. >> >> I have been thinking about moving the USB PD negotiation details to a >> separate structure that could be more accessible for everybody. That >> should allow me continue to protect my precious structures. But I have >> not yet put much though into that. > >
