On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 1:01 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/1/21 6:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:27 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> The commit 3eb619b2f7d8 ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version
> >> v1.6.0-11-g9d7888cbf19c") updated dtc version which also contained DTC
> >> commit
> >> "81e0919a3e21 checks: Add interrupt provider test"
> >> where reasons for this checking are mentioned as
> >> "A missing #address-cells property is less critical, but creates
> >> ambiguities when used in interrupt-map properties, so warn about this as
> >> well now."
> >>
> >> Add address-cells property to gic and gpio nodes to get rid of this warning.
> >> The similar change has been done for ZynqMP too.
> >
> > FYI, we're going to make this check dependent on having an
> > interrupt-map property. So adding these isn't necessary.
>
> Good to know. Is there going to be report if interrupt-map doesn't
> exist? Which can end up with reverting these changes?
You mean a warning if '#address-cells' is present and interrupt-map is
not? No, that would cause lots of warnings.
Rob
