On 1/31/21 7:18 AM, Kyle Tso wrote:
> Commit a079973f462a ("usb: typec: tcpm: Remove tcpc_config
> configuration mechanism") removed the tcpc_config which includes the
> Sink VDO and it is not yet added back with fwnode. Add it now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Tso <kyletso@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - updated the commit message
>
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index 403a483645dd..84c8a52f8af1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -5677,6 +5677,18 @@ static int tcpm_fw_get_caps(struct tcpm_port *port,
> port->new_source_frs_current = frs_current;
> }
>
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(fwnode, "sink-vdos", NULL, 0);
fwnode_property_count_u32(), maybe ?
> + if (ret <= 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {
> + return -EINVAL;
Why return any error except -EINVAL (including return values of 0) as -EINVAL,
and -EINVAL as no error ?
> + } else if (ret > 0) {
> + port->nr_snk_vdo = min(ret, VDO_MAX_OBJECTS);
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(fwnode, "sink-vdos",
> + port->snk_vdo,
> + port->nr_snk_vdo);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
static analyzer code used to complain about overriding error codes.
Not sure if that is still true. Either case, why not return the
original error ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
