On 2021/1/27 6:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:46 PM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The vendor prefix of "Hisilicon Limited" is "hisilicon", it is clearly
>> stated in "vendor-prefixes.yaml".
>>
>> Fixes: 35ca8168133c ("arm64: dts: Add dts files for Hisilicon Hi3660 SoC")
>> Fixes: dd8c7b78c11b ("arm64: dts: Add devicetree for Hisilicon Hi3670 SoC")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Chen Feng <puck.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I see this change in the pull request I got, but I'm a bit worried about the
> incompatible binding change. Wouldn't the correct path forward be to
> list both the correct and the incorrect properties, both in the dts file
> and in the driver that interprets the properties?
Hi, Arnd:
This is one of the patch series. The other three patches have been applied by Philipp Zabel and are currently in linux-next.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/10/697
>
> The binding file in this case would need to list the old name as deprecated,
> though I'm not sure how that would work without causing a warning about
> the unknown vendor prefix.
>
> Arnd
>
> .
>
