On 13:57-20210121, Suman Anna wrote: > This is all moot when your own tree doesn't boot properly. In this case, you are > adding MMC nodes, but yet for a boot test, you are saying use linux-next for the > nodes that were added or you need additional driver patches (which is not how > maintainer-level trees are verified). Get your facts straight please. What do you mean does'nt boot? It does boot with initramfs which is the minimum qual i had set for any new platform (along with. - your need is for a device node to work - which is both a combination of defconfig + driver updates. > > Arnd, > Can you please guide us here as to what is expected in general, given that the > pull-request from Nishanth goes through you, and if there is some pre-existing > norms around this? > > Tony, > Appreciate your input as well since you probably have dealt with these kinda of > dependencies on OMAP. I am more than happy to drop this entire SoC off my queue (I am yet to pick it up), which is probably what I will do. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
