On 20-01-21, 10:36, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19-01-21, 09:44, Frank Rowand wrote: > > No. overlay_base.dts is intentionally compiled into a base FDT, not > > an overlay. Unittest intentionally unflattens this FDT in early boot, > > in association with unflattening the system FDT. One key intent > > behind this is to use the same memory allocation method that is > > used for the system FDT. > > > > Do not try to convert overlay_base.dts into an overlay. > > Okay, but why does it have /plugin/; specified in it then ? > > And shouldn't we create two separate dtb-s now, static_test.dtb and > static_overlay_test.dtb ? As fdtoverlay will not be able to merge it with > testcase.dtb anyway. > > Or maybe we can create another file static_overlay.dts (like testcases.dts) > which can include both testcases.dts and overlay_base.dts, and then we can > create static_test.dtb out of it ? That won't impact the runtime tests at all. Hmm, I noticed just now that you have kept overlay.dtb out of the build, probably we should then drop overlay_base.dtb as well ? -- viresh
