Em Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:46:22 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:14:20AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > +int hi6421_spmi_pmic_read(struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic, int reg)
> > +{
> > + struct spmi_device *pdev;
> > + u8 read_value = 0;
> > + u32 ret;
> > +
> > + pdev = to_spmi_device(pmic->dev);
> > + if (!pdev) {
> > + pr_err("%s: pdev get failed!\n", __func__);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = spmi_ext_register_readl(pdev, reg, &read_value, 1);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_err("%s: spmi_ext_register_readl failed!\n", __func__);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + return read_value;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hi6421_spmi_pmic_read);
>
> The I/O here looks a lot like regmap_spmi_ext.
Did a test here converting it to use regmap. It worked.
I'm sending a (hopefully) final patchset.
Regards,
Mauro
