On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 4:41 PM Roger Lu <roger.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> [snip]
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Svs efuse parsing */
> > > > + ft_pgm = (svsp->efuse[0] >> 4) & GENMASK(3, 0);
> > > > +
> > > > + for (idx = 0; idx < svsp->bank_num; idx++) {
> > > > + svsb = &svsp->banks[idx];
> > > > +
> > > > + if (ft_pgm <= 1)
> > > > + svsb->init01_volt_flag = SVSB_INIT01_VOLT_IGNORE;
> > > > +
> > > > + switch (svsb->sw_id) {
> > > > + case SVSB_CPU_LITTLE:
> > > > + svsb->bdes = svsp->efuse[16] & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > > > + svsb->mdes = (svsp->efuse[16] >> 8) & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > > > + svsb->dcbdet = (svsp->efuse[16] >> 16) & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > > > + svsb->dcmdet = (svsp->efuse[16] >> 24) & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > > > + svsb->mtdes = (svsp->efuse[17] >> 16) & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > >
> > > Again, if all of those values were u8, there'd be no need for these GENMASK
> >
> > Ok, I'll use u8 instead of GENMASK. Thanks.
>
> After refining the codes, I think it's much explicit to assign the bits
> I want by GENMASK() and will remove other GENMASK() that are repetitive
> like in svs_set_bank_phase() or svs_set_freqs_pct_v2().
I'm not sure what you mean, but, sure, you can go ahead with v11 and
we'll see how it looks.
Thanks,
> [snip]
>
