Re: Is there a reason not to use -@ to compile devicetrees ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

> Read the last time this came up:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/71fb0ff289e84c55bd92ecd96bc9aa76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks a lot, this answers my question.

In my case, I do not expect the kernel to apply the overlay, so I believe
I avoid 99% of the complexity mentionned in that thread.

Would the following patch (in reply) be acceptable ?

Especially:
- Is it fine to add such config option without selecting it anywhere ?
- DTC_FLAGS_overlay* and DTC_FLAGS_testcases can contain -@, should I try
  to figure a way out to make them select this option ?

Regards,
Vincent Pelletier





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux