On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > > > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > > > > by DT project. > > > > > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > > > > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Thanks, applied. > > > > Sorry, what? > > > > Applied to what tree? > > I took it to (local copy) of leds-next tree on. But now I realised it > is mfd, not a LED patch, so I undone that. Sorry for the confusion. > > Anyway, patch still looks good to me: > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> Thanks Pavel. I plan on taking this next week. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
