On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:59:33AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > 于 2020年12月14日 GMT+08:00 下午6:37:04, Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> 写到: > >On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 04:42:32PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> Early adopters' PineTabs (and all further releases) will have a new > >LCD > >> panel different with the one that is used when in development > >(because > >> the old panel's supply discontinued). > >> > >> Add a new DT compatible for it. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 5 +++++ > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > >b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > >> index 6db32fbf813f..73a6c8421172 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > >> @@ -700,6 +700,11 @@ properties: > >> - const: pine64,pinetab > >> - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64 > >> > >> + - description: Pine64 PineTab with new LCD panel > >> + items: > >> + - const: pine64,pinetab-new-panel > >> + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64 > >> + > > > >We're on the right track, but new panel seems a bit too vague. What is > >going to happen when they will change the panel again? > > > >pinetab-early-adopter seems more robust there > > This name will only match a batch. Look, I know the situation sucks. Can we actually move forward? Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
