On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:20:24PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > On 20/06/2014 17:01, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > Add new atmel AIC (Advanced Interrupt Controller) driver based on the > > generic chip infrastructure. > > > > This driver is only compatible with dt enabled board and replaces the old > > implementation found in arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 + > > drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c | 700 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 708 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > index bbb746e..6a7ad81 100644 > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ config ARM_VIC_NR > > The maximum number of VICs available in the system, for > > power management. > > > > +config ATMEL_AIC_IRQ > > + bool > > + select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP > > + select IRQ_DOMAIN > > + select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > + select SPARSE_IRQ > > + > > I just though a bit about it and it might be better to split AIC and > AIC5 support in 2 different drivers, because the AIC is only available > on at91sam9/at91rm9200 SoCs and AIC5 only available on sama5 SoCs, and > AFAICT there is no combination of both controller in a singler SoC. > > Jason, Thomas, let me know if you think this worth the trouble, and if > so, should I keep a common implementation (in irq-atmel-aic-common.c/.h) > for the shared functions/structures. It sounds sensible, and we have a similar situation brewing with the gic family. I'd like to hear from the at91 maintainers, though. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
