On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:48:54 -0500, Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> > There are a bunch of users open coding the for_each_node_by_name() by >>>>> > calling of_find_node_by_name() directly instead of using the macro. This >>>>> > is getting in the way of some cleanups, and the possibility of removing >>>>> > of_find_node_by_name() entirely. Clean it up so that all the users are >>>>> > consistent. >>>>> > >>>>> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> > --- >>>>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/feature.c | 20 +++++--------------- >>>>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pci.c | 2 +- >>>>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c | 2 +- >>>>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/udbg_adb.c | 2 +- >>>>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 3 +-- >>>>> > drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 3 +-- >>>>> > drivers/edac/cell_edac.c | 3 +-- >>>>> > drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_core.c | 4 ++-- >>>>> > drivers/tty/serial/pmac_zilog.c | 9 +++------ >>>>> > sound/ppc/pmac.c | 6 +++--- >>>>> > 10 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >>>>> > >>>>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/feature.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/feature.c >>>>> > index 63d82bbc05e9..39e1d163c427 100644 >>>>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/feature.c >>>>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/feature.c >>>>> > @@ -2805,25 +2805,20 @@ set_initial_features(void) >>>>> > /* Enable GMAC for now for PCI probing. It will be disabled >>>>> > * later on after PCI probe >>>>> > */ >>>>> > - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "ethernet"); >>>>> > - while(np) { >>>>> > + for_each_node_by_name(np, "ethernet") >>>>> > if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "K2-GMAC")) >>>>> >>>>> Can't for_each_compatible_node be used here instead? >>>> >>>> Not easily without changing the behaviour. It would need to then check >>>> the name inside the block. >>> >>> Why would it change behavior? If the compatible string matches, do you >>> really have cases where the node name is not "ethernet"? I don't >>> believe it's the kernel's job to validate DT bindings. >> >> Yes, there are actually some bindings that have the same compatible >> property but behaviour changes based on node name! I don't want to do >> the legwork to figure out if these are in that group. Someone else can >> do that job. > > Well, that's just wrong. true. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html