Re: [v4 01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:15:05 +0800, Biwen Li wrote:
> Add an new IRQ chip declaration for LS1043A and LS1088A
> - compatible "fsl,ls1043a-extirq" for LS1043A, LS1046A.
> - compatible "fsl,ls1088a-extirq" for LS1088A, LS208xA, LX216xA.
> - get mask value directly according to compatible property of DT
>   and remove confused code(bit_reverse field of struct ls_extirq_data,
>   no need this field for SoC LS1021A. Because the register
>   LS1021A_SCFGREVCR is initialized to 0xffffffff by the relative rcw)

Applied to irq/irqchip-next, thanks!

[01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external interrupt
        commit: b16a1caf4686895427c810219d4b2f796e676160
[11/11] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: update bindings for supporting more SoCs
        commit: 9898a59358d7cb925f63bb77bd40224d1bc4857e

Patches 2-10 should be routed via the SoC tree.

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux